Skip to main content

Full text of "Career situation of female astronomers in Germany"

See other formats

Astron. Nachr. / AN 333, No. 3, 280-|286|(2012) / DOI 10.1002/asna.20121 1656 

Career situation of female astronomers in Germany 














J. Fohlmeister^ ^ and Ch. Helling^ 

^ Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum fiir Astronomie der Universitat Heidelberg, MonchhofstraBe 12-14, D-69120 
Heidelberg, Germany 

^ SUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK 

Received 2012 Feb 10, accepted 2012 Mar 2 
Published online 2012 Apr 5 

Key words miscellaneous - publications, bibliography - sociology of astronomy 

We survey the job situation of women in astronomy in Germany and of German women abroad and review indicators for 
their career development. Our sample includes women astronomers from all academic levels from doctoral students to 
professors, as well as female astronomers who have left the field. We find that networking and human support are among 
the most important factors for success. Experience shows that students should carefully choose their supervisor and collect 
practical knowledge abroad. We reflect the private situation of female German astronomers and find that prejudices are 
abundant, and are perceived as discriminating. We identify reasons why women are more likely than men to quit astronomy 
after they obtain their PhD degree. We give recommendations to young students on what to pay attention to in order to be 
on the successful path in astronomy. 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 

1 Introduction 

Although astronomy is regarded as more attractive to 
women compared to physics, the number of women who 
strive for a career in astrophysics is reduced significantly 
with each career step, resulting in a high degree of un- 
derrepresentation at professorial level. Woman in general 
do not have a strong presence in science and technology, 
with the proportion of woman varying widely within Eu- 
rope. In Germany, women are known to have less interest 
than men in natural science than in other EU countries (e.g. 
lAinuddin et al. 20031) . The percentage of female students in 
physics (that provide the pool for future astronomers) at 
German universities is of 20 % since years. 

In the past and in the present, women astronomers had 
and have the choice of blending in with their environment 
or just accept to be different. Many of us were wondering 
for a good fraction of our career if our experiences, for in- 
stance in feeling as the odd-one-out during an opening ad- 
dress like "Good morning Sirs" or by aiming for quality 
rather than self-assertion, are singularities. Should we just 
learn to adjust, and become less thin-skinned when being 
confronted with degrading comments and prejudice because 
this is what happens when climbing the hierarchy? Do we 
have to work harder in order to be promoted? Are we really 
confronted with discrimination or just too sensitive when 
meeting a bad-tempered person - one out of so many bril- 
liantly intelligent, helpful and supportive colleagues of both 

Factors that affect the hiring of female faculty candi- 
dates and carreer barriers in natural sciences have been 

mainly studied in the US (e.g. lGreene et al. 20111) . To quan- 
tify the status of women in astronomy in Germany and of 
German women abroad the AstroFrauenNetzwerk (AFN) 
in Germany has conducted two surveys over the last two 
years. The AstroFrauenNetzwerk was founded in 2007 as 
an independent network for female astronomers who hold a 
PhD in Germany or have obtained their PhD in Germany. Its 
aim is to connect women astronomers, to collect and share 
relevant information and to help its fellow members in and 
from a country where women are traditionally underrepre- 
sented on managerial levels not to mention the professorial 
level. Meanwhile the AFN has 73 regular members of var- 
ious nationalities working in or originating from Germany 
plus 3 associated international members. Two of the found- 
ing members of the AFN now hold permanent posts outside 

In a first study in 2010, a sociologist worked with the 
AstroFrauenNetzwerk evaluating the gender distribution in 
astronomy in Germany. Data were collected from German 
astronomy institute^ and their web pages, and the annual 
reports of the Astronomische GesellschaftH The percentage 
of women in German astronomy was found to be about 20 % 
among students, which is comparable to the proportion of 
physics in general. There is an increased number of female 
PhD students compared to graduates in astronomy, mainly 
due to the recruitment of international students. At postdoc 
level the percentage of women drops to 17.2 % and becomes 
fractional at professorial level with 3.8 %. 

In a second step, we used our own, independent pool 
of women astronomers to produce statistics regarding the 

Corresponding author: 

^ Some German institutes questioned our right to collect these data. 
^ |www . astro . rug . nl/ ~lcamp/AFNmeeting2 010 . html] 


© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 

Astron. Nachr. / AN (2012) 


status of women in astronomy in Germany and of German 
women abroad and indicators for the career development of 
these women. Here we report the latest results of a compre- 
hensive survey conducted in autumn 201 1. 

Before presenting our results, we are sketching the big- 
ger picture of German women in natural sciences and as- 
tronomy as it emerges from recent statistics of the Ger- 
man Research Foundation (DFG), the International Astro- 
nomical Union (lAU), the Max Planck Society (MPG), the 
German Physics Society (DPG), the American Institute of 
Physics, and the University of Heidelberg. 

According to the DFG statistics that is based on mate- 
rial from proposal evaluations, between 2005 and 2008 only 
6.8 % DFG proposals for individual grants in astrophysics 
and astronomy were submitted by women in Germany. The 
statistics for the year 2010 published by the DFG show that 
for all natural sciences the funding rates for all branches was 
somewhat lower for women (42.9 %) than for men (45.8 %). 
The principle investigator- ship (PI) of women in DFG re- 
search units (Forschergruppen) proposals was 8 % in natu- 
ral sciences and 8.7 % for Pl-ship in the framework of the 
Excellence Initiative of the German universitiesHThe num- 
bers from the DFG statistics refer to submitted applications 
only. The question here is: Are these numbers representative 
for women in the respective scientific level? 

Regarding the presence of women in the Interna- 
tional Astronomical Union (lAU), Germany holds one 
of the last positions (31 out of 36 national members, 
ICesarsky & Walker 2010| ) with 9.1 % women members in 
20100 Individual Membership in the lAU is open to sci- 
entists holding a PhD and who are "eligible for election 
as individual members" admitted by a national member (in 
Germany: Rat Deutscher Stern warten, in UK: Royal Astro- 
nomical Society, etc.). This means to become a member of 
the lAU the person has to have a certain visibility to be pro- 
moted. If women have difficulties with recognition or show- 
ing initiative they will be underrepresented in the lAU com- 
pared to the female astronomers population in Germany. 

The local organizing committee of the annual meeting 
of the Astronomische Gesellschaft in Heidelberg in Septem- 
ber 201 1 counted 20 % women among the 430 participants. 
Out of all female participants approximately half currently 
work in Germany. 32 % (6 in numbers) of the invited ple- 
nary talks were given by women, including a high fraction 
of international female astronomers. 

The Max Planck Society, one of Germany's leading re- 
search organizations, operates nine research institutions in 
Germany that carry out research in astronomy and astro- 
physics. These institutions are lead by a total of 32 directors, 
not one of them is female 

^ For more details and additional data see 
|www . df g . de/download/pdf /f oerd erung/ . 

^ See www . iau . org/ad ministration/members hip/ for the 
geographical distribution. 


The questions that follow are: where have the female 
astronomers from Germany gone before reaching top level? 
Are they (consciously or unconsciously) less promoted af- 
ter PhD and/or do they prefer to leave either the country or 

In a survey initiated by the Equal Opportunities Study 
Group of the German Physics Society (DPG) in 2002 
among 1500 male and female physicists and astrophysicists 
in Germany, men with children were found to receive the 
greatest opportunities in their profession, followed by men 
without children and women without children. Women with 
children were found off the beaten track. The latter suffering 
reservations on the part of employers (who are on the major- 
ity male) fearing caring for a family will affect their perfor- 
mance at work. Moreover, the DPG study found that women 
were more rarely in executive positions and had lower in- 
come than their male colleagues (K onekamp et al. 2002| ). 

A similar but world-wide survey of 15 000 physicists by 
the American Institute of Physics found that women are less 
likely than men to report access to various resources and 
opportunities that would be helpful in advancing a scien- 
tific career (international opportunities, invitations to speak, 
supervisory experiences, serving on committees that have 
influence, editor of journal, advising students) and are more 
often assigned to less challenging work by their employer 
when they became a parent ( ,Cesarsky & Walker 2010, see 

A recent study at the Department of Physics and As- 
tronomy in Heidelberg, which is the largest of its kind in 
Germany, showed that women more often fear failure than 
men, although no difference in their qualification and com- 
mitment for a physics career was found. Reasons are a mix- 
ture of missing support and subsequent self-underestimation 
(IFohlmeister et al. 201 OK which is alarming given the de- 
mographic challenges Germany is facing in the coming 

Here we focus on the career status of German female as- 
tronomers. Our sample includes women astronomers from 
all academic levels from doctoral students to professors, 
working in Germany and abroad, as well as female as- 
tronomers who have left the field. In this study we examine 
the situation of female astronomers and identify important 
criteria for a career in astrophysics. We investigate private 
and professional impact factors as well as reasons to work 
or not to work abroad. We also show the comments and 
cite three example situations female astronomers are still 
confronted with, and hope to increase the awareness that 
comments and behavior like these are discriminating and 
socially retarded. 

2 Survey description 

The survey presented here was conducted by collecting 
data via an online-questionnaire. This questionnaire was 
designed in preparation of the annual meeting of the As- 
troFrauenNetzwerk (AFN) in September 2011. The invi- 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 


J. Fohlmeister & Ch. Helling: AstroFrauenNetzwerk Survey 

tation to participate in the survey was sent to all mem- 
bers of the AFN. The members were also asked to forward 
the invitation to participate to all women astronomers in 
their respective institutes and to female German- speaking 
colleagues world-wide. To participate in the survey ques- 
tions had to be answered online anonymously. Altogether 
61 women filled in the questionnaire. No reliable statis- 
tics are available on how many German- speaking female 
astronomers work in Germany and abroad. Comparing the 
number of participants in this study (61) to the number of all 
AFN-members (73), we estimate that the participation com- 
pleteness of this survey is at least 80 % . We note that not all 
AFN members filled the questionnaire and not all women 
who filled the questionnaire are AFN members. 

2.1 Target group for survey 

Our data define a representative sample of the German as- 
tronomical community. It includes female astronomers from 
all academic levels ranging from doctoral students to profes- 
sors, as well as female astronomers who have left the field 
and work outside astronomy. 

The age distribution of the participants is Gaussian, with 
a peak around 31-35 years. Due to the composition of the 
AFN (women can become members after obtaining their 
PhD), the fraction of postdocs is largest within this survey. It 
also includes a fair fraction of female junior research group 
leaders (5 in numbers) and professors (4 in numbers). In 
this sample the category "professor" applies to all professo- 
rial titles, e.g. full professorships as well as German "apl. 
Professor" (adjunct professor). Their small total numbers 
among the participants in this survey reflects the underrep- 
resentation of women in the German academic system. Cur- 
rently only two full university and three associate astronomy 
professorships are filled with women in Germany. There ex- 
ist different forms of junior research group positions in as- 
tronomy. Only DFG-funded research groups in the Emmy 
Noether program list the number of female research group 
leaders in astronomy (currently 5 out of 13 in total). 

Out of all woman who participated in the survey, more 
than two third (70 %) grew up in Germany, 27 % in other 
countries in Europe and 3 % overseas. 

3 Survey results 

3.1 Current and desired work place 

73 % of the survey participants worked in Germany when 
they filled in the survey, 20 % in other European countries, 
several (7 %) outside Europe. We were interested if Ger- 
many is seen as an attractive work place to perform as- 
tronomical research. Therefore all participants in the sur- 
vey who are not located in Germany were asked, if they 
would like to work in Germany and why. About one third 
(27 %) answered with "yes" and gave private reasons for 
their decision such as cultural binding or that they wish to 

be close to family and friends. About 20 % answered with 
"no"; mainly due to work related reasons, stating that they 
prefer the better working conditions, having more scientific 
freedom, working in countries with better research politics, 
or the teaching approach in their respective country of work. 
Some of the women working outside Germany dislike Ger- 
man attitude ("Germany is too German", in USA "weniger 
Gemecker" (less nagging)). 

The duration of the current contracts of all survey par- 
ticipants shows a flat distribution ranging from 1 to 5 years 
with a small peak around 3 years (25%). Only 14% of 
the women who responded hold a permanent position (8 in 
numbers). Nevertheless, 32 % are satisfied with their current 
job situation and 35 % rank their job as "short transitional 
phase", 40 % as stable phase and 25 % as "long-term per- 

3.1.1 Finding a job 

Our results show that the way of finding a job in astronomy 
is two-fold in Germany, either by the path of job advertise- 
ments or applying to soft money, or else by personal con- 

This is reflected in the numbers: German- speaking fe- 
male astronomers find their job mainly due to personal con- 
tacts (46 %) and/or the classical advertisement on the inter- 
net (40 %). About 20 % have changed their position within 
the institute. The percentage of women who were person- 
ally asked to come for the job is the same as the percentage 
of those who raised their own money (both 18 %). 

We also wanted to identify what the most important cri- 
teria on which women base their decision for a job are. The 
survey participants decided for a position mainly based on 
how interesting a project appeared (Fig.[T}. The second most 
important factor is vicinity of family (this includes spouses 
and all kind of relatives like parents or children), followed 
by working conditions or the reputation of the institute. Job 
safety, the salary, a desired change of location or the offered 
prospect of promotion are among the less decisive factors. 

3.1.2 Satisfaction and contentment 

We asked about the satisfaction and how content the women 
were with different job aspects (see Fig. O. Most female 
astronomers are happy about the possibility of carrying out 
their own ideas, the availability/amount of travel funds, their 
scientific projects and working conditions. These match the 
above selection criteria in Fig.[T] 

On the other hand, female astronomers are less satis- 
fied with their promotion prospects and job- safety. We note 
that these two points were not decisive for choosing the job. 
Other criteria like professional training, work life-balance, 
working time, equipment and family support, and salary are 
neither ranked very high nor very low. 

42 % of the female astronomers in our sample state that 
they want to continue research in astronomy in the long 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 

Astron. Nachr. / AN (2012) 


interesting project 
vicinity of family 
working conditions 
reputation of the institute 
fantastic team 
qualification potential 
lack of alternatives | 
job safety 

salary | | 
desired location change ( ] 
promotion prospects | ] 










1 1 .5% 

Fig. 1 "Why did you decide for your current position?" 
Percentage of women who selected above factors (multi- 
ple answers were possible), sorted by frequency of men- 
tion. The only not work-related reason of choice, "vicinity 
of family", is ranked second highest. 

scientific projects 

[working conditions" 

promotion prospects 

professional training 
working time 

job safety 


possibility to realize own ideas 

family support 

travel funds 





— H 



"\ 1 

y 1 





Fig. 2 (online colour at: "Are you 
happy with your ...?" Left is "very happy", right "not at all". 
Average contentment of all survey participants with differ- 
ent job aspects. 

term, 55 % if possible. Only 3 % say they "don't need to". 
One woman stated: "Under current circumstances my an- 
swer is: yes, if possible, but not at any cost. With just a 
slightly better perspective for a permanent position I would 
say: yes, absolutely- dream job. The result above might also 
be biased in the sense that woman who do not want to stay 
in astronomy did not participate in the survey. 

3.1.3 Salaries 

The average monthly net income summarized here can be 
treated as an orientation on what young females should ex- 
pect as a minimum in astronomy in Germany. Global sur- 
veys suggest a note of caution as they show that men have 
generally higher incomes. We note that the average numbers 

from our sample do not reflect the individual salaries, which 
strongly depend on the source of funding, the employer and 
regional differences. For PhD students the average monthly 
net income in the sample is 1255 EURO, for postdocs 2080 
EURO and for staff astronomers 3210 EURO. We note 
that the salaries of female astronomers who work outside 
academia show an extremely broad range. This also holds 
for female professors, depending on successful negotiation. 

3.2 Private life 

About 77 % of the female astronomers in our sample have a 
partner. Out of these, every second woman is engaged with 
an astronomer or physicist. The spouses of the remaining 
participants work outside sciences (44 % out of 77 %) or 
in the minority (6 % out of 77 %) doing other science than 
physics or astronomy. So, if female astronomers choose a 
partner, every second woman goes for a "colleague". Other 
scientists than astronomers or physicists are the exception. 
In 90 % of all cases in our sample the partner lives in the 
same city, 10 % have long-distance relationships. 

3.2.1 Motherhood 

Being mother applies only to one third of our sample, nev- 
ertheless 90 % would like to have at least one child in the 
future. Reasons for not having children yet are a mix of job- 
related and private reasons. 60 % of these women refer to 
the uncertain job situation. Around one third states the lack 
of right partner or that they do not see how to arrange work 
and family, or that the work-load is too high. About 10 % 
do not want to have children. Those who became mothers 
feel very restricted in mobility and point out that it is harder 
to combine job and family. However, mothers feel generally 
more balanced and motivated. 

3.3 Career development 

We asked how many stays abroad for more than 3 months 
have been carried out. Despite the career importance of 
working abroad, 29 % of the female astronomers in the sam- 
ple never had a stay abroad so far. All female staff, profes- 
sors and astronomers with permanent positions in this sur- 
vey had at least one stay abroad for more than 3 months. 

More than 40 % of the female astronomers in our sam- 
ple have been supported by a mentor, mainly male mentors 
(70 %) and state that having a mentor was very helpful for 
their career (Fig. |3]l. Note, that these numbers do not refer 
to a professional mentoring scheme. 

It was consensus (see Fig.|4l) that the most important fac- 
tors for a career in astronomy are networking, the number of 
papers, to work on a hot topic, the quality of research, and 
a regular presence at conferences. Networking and regular 
presence at conferences were favored by all female profes- 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 


J. Fohlmeister & Ch. Helling: AstroFrauenNetzwerk Survey 



13% 34.8% 43.5% 

not important 

11.8% 41.2% 35.3% 5.9% 5.9% 


Fig. 3 (online colour at: Left is 
"Mentor was not important", right "extremely helpful for 
the career". Percentage of answers (on top) and mean value 
(red bar) of all female astronomers who had a mentor. 


number of papers 
work on hot topic 
quality of own research 

regular presence at conferences 

working independently 
work experience abroad 
a strong mentor 
organising skills 
negotiating skills 
ability to work in a team 
support by family 
special knowledge 
general knowledge in astronomy 















Fig. 4 (online colour at: "What are 
the most important factors for a career in astronomy?" Per- 
centage of women who selected above factors (multiple an- 
swers were possible), sorted by frequency of mention. "Net- 
working" and "regular presence at conferences" are the fa- 
vorites in the subgroup of female professors. 

3.3.1 Contentment with current job 

The contentment with the current job situation of female 
astronomers is good and even shifting from okay to very 
good with each career advance (Fig. [5]). Nonetheless only 
17 % would recommend to young female students to strive 
for a career in astronomy (Fig. |6). Most (77 %) say "every 
student has to decide for herself, only 7% say "no". This 
seems to be in contrast to the fact that more than 90 % state 
that they would like to continue astronomical research and 
their overall contentment. It can be explained with the inse- 
cure funding situation, long-term perspective and mobility 
constraints or just that for some women both statements re- 
flect independent issues. 

3.3.2 What was helpful for your career? 

All women in the sample were asked for their experience on 
what was helpful for their career in astronomy as a recom- 
mendation to younger women. 
Helpful is/was 

- a motivating, encouraging, acknowledging boss/super- 
visor who was a good mentor and trusted in abilities. 

phd students 




1 2 
20% 40% j 

3 4 5 
20% 20% 0% 

1 y£ 3 4 5 

50% /50% 0% 0% 0% 

1 2 3 4 5 

Fig. 5 (online colour at: w "All in all, 
how content are you with your current job situation?" Left 
is "very", right "not at all". Percentages and mean values 
(red bar) for different career levels. 

absolutely [ ] 
every student has to decide for herself ( 

no [J 


Fig. 6 "Would you recommend to young female students 
to strive for a career in astronomy?" 

and who helped getting hands on excellent data and who 
introduced into networks, 

- finding projects as well as self-motivation and working 

- having role models for different topics and life phases, 

- attending and giving talks at conferences, colloquia and 

- successful applications for grants, observing time and 
soft money, 

- stays abroad and flexibility, and 

- colleagues who helped to advance. 

3.3.3 What was/is harmful for the career? 

We asked all participants to describe their experience on 
what is harmful for a career in astronomy. The answers, al- 
though very different for individuals, show the contrary of 
the above recommendations. 
Harmful is 

- unreliable line-managers/supervisors, 

- bad advisor/no strong mentor/no strong group (resulting 
in bad PhD, PhD/habilitation takes too long, lack of pa- 
pers, no collaborations, no counseling, lack of support, 
no networking), 

- change of PhD-advisor, 

- not being able to plan freely/choose a job anywhere (due 
to partner or children, maternity breaks), 

- no/not enough stays abroad (after PhD!), 

- working too much in teaching/management/service, 

- staying too long at same place, being old, 

- lack of self-promotion, 

- not working on a hot topic. 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 

Astron. Nachr. / AN (2012) 


- working in big collaborations (depending on the author- 
ship policy). 

3.4 A backward time-dilatation of German society? 

This part of the survey was meant to seeing gender issues 
less dead-serious. Unfortunately, the examples that were 
collected are more embarrassing for our society as a whole, 
above all. After a long discussion whether these comments 
should be published, the participants in the 20 11 AFN meet- 
ing in Heidelberg decided to do so. Our goal is not to shock 
or make fun of individuals, but rather to show what female 
astronomers are still confronted with. By publishing these 
remarks, we hope to increase the awareness that comments 
like these are perceived as discriminating. 
The examples fall in three categories: 

1. General designation (unconscious or conscious preju- 

1.1. I know you would like to work, but if all women 
would stay at home, we would have much less un- 

1.2. For a woman your seminar was good. 

1.3. You must be the secretary. 

1.4. Female scientists are more masculine than normal 

1.5. Special programs for women discriminate men. 

1 . 6. Good morning gentlemen. 

1.7. Dear Sir. 

1.8. Ha ha, that is the alibi/quota woman! 

2. Women are not treated independently of their partner: 

2. 1 . The husband of this (female ) applicant has a better 
position, so she does not need a job. 

2. 2. Why you want more money ? Your husband is work- 

2.3. Will you stop your PhD education now that you 

3. Pressing into the mother-role: 

3.1. You have a diploma [i.e., M.Sc. degree], why do 
you also want a PhD? Now you can go home and 
have children. 

3.2. Women who give birth dont come back. 

3.3. To a woman with children: 

The permanent position is for mister XY, he has to 
support his family. 

3.4. She wouldn't come anyway (for a job) due to the 

3.5. It is better for the children if the mother stays at 

Since the above statements represent a collection of 
comments from our survey, we do not know in which con- 
text these have been verbalized. Some comments have been 
repeated several times and perceived as more unfair with 

each repetition. Even if some of those comments were not 
meant to be serious we conclude that role stereotypes and 
unconscious bias are still at work. 

3.5 Example situations 

In the following we list three example situations from Ger- 
man universities and research institutes that have been re- 
ported to us. These examples illustrate, why female as- 
tronomers are less likely than men to proceed with a career 
in science after the PhD. Names and places are not given 
in order to protect individuals who shared their experience 
wishing for a positive social evolution of our science com- 

a) Selection committee for a full professorship at a 
German university: This university has five full profes- 
sorships in astronomy, none of them filled with a female 
astronomer. The female applicant gives her science pre- 
sentation and is interrupted by the head of the selection 
committee shortly after the beginning. The interrupting 
person turns to the audience saying: "Nobody believes 
that anyway." During the following interview, the equal 
opportunity officer discredits the applicant in a similar 
manner by stating that the respective university did not 
have any gender issues. 

b) Equally qualified female postdoc works at the same 
institution as her husband: He has a full contract 
including health insurance for not employed family 
members, and she was told to content herself with a 
stipend. In contrast to a regular contract, the stipend 
does not entitle her to retirement benefits, unemploy- 
ment compensation, or parental allowance. Knowing 
that she is bound to the place due to family issues, the 
employer put her on a project position where she can 
perform scientific research only in a very limited frame, 
this way pressing her out of track. 

c) Female scientist with children working at a German 
university: She negotiates with her supervisor to work 
partly at home to use her time more efficiently. As a re- 
sult, she is pressed to accept a part-time contract. Male 
colleagues with children in the same research group 
spend less time than her at work, but are fully paid with- 
out any inquiries. 

Each example reflects individual situations that might 
not be gender specific. However, these are three cases, that 
were brought to our attention by female astronomers only. 
We note that all above institutions have signed commit- 
ments to increase the fraction of female scientists at all ca- 
reer stages as well as gender policies that should ensure that 
qualified female astronomers experience equal opportuni- 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Yerlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim 


J. Fohlmeister & Ch. Helling: AstroFrauenNetzwerk Survey 

4 Conclusion 

In this survey we study the job situation of women in astron- 
omy in Germany and of German women abroad and review 
indicators for their career development. Our main findings 
can be summarized as follows: 

1. Networking and human support are essential. 

2. Young students should carefully choose their supervisor. 

3. Postdoctoral experience abroad is a crucial factor. 

4. Motherhood complicates things. 

5. Prejudices are abundant, and are perceived as discrimi- 

6. Never trust a (job) promise until everything is fixed on 
paper and signed by all parties. 

Networking is an important part of science and every- 
day life. Women find networking in professional environ- 
ments challenging as they usually juggle more than just 
their jobs and are still confronted with gender prejudice. We 
recommend young students to carefully choose the group 
they want to work with and to regularly attend and give 
talks at conferences. Since surveys ( |Konekamp et al. 2002[ 
I vie & Tesfaye 20lT| IFohlmeister et al. 20101) have shown 
that women in general are at risk to receive less opportu- 
nities, having a good and trustworthy mentor can be ex- 
tremely helpful for the advancement (see studys also stud- 
ies by itsui 20101 [Tyson & Borman 2010| ). We find that al- 
most every second participant in our survey found their cur- 
rent job due to personal contacts. This means that young 
students increase their chances by having a good network. 
Astronomy institutions should put efforts to support female 
potentials in this respect as history shows that this comes 
naturally more often only for men. Here we do not want to 
give the impression that networking is more important than 
an excellent publication output, successful fund-raising and 
scientific standing. But nevertheless it is very important for 
building successful collaborations and social- scientific con- 
tacts that help to reach these goals. Many measures for sci- 
entific success, as the number of citations or invitations to 
give talks, also depend on networking. 

Most universities and research institutes in Germany 
have equal opportunities statutes. This includes procedures 
of international standard, like involving external committees 
when hiring people on high-level positions, and commit- 
tees composed of a diversity of members including women. 
However, there have been reported cases, where written 
equal opportunity clauses were ignored or the equal oppor- 
tunity representatives (being sometimes the secretary, un- 
dergraduate students or women on short-term contract) had 
no power to implement them. 

Although experience abroad is essential for a career 
in astronomy, a considerable fraction of young female as- 
tronomers seem to prefer to be close to family and friends 
when choosing a job. When it comes to motherhood women 
get restricted in mobility. Additionally, they are more often 
confronted with prejudice. The overall contentment with the 
work of women in astronomy is good and even improves 

with each career advance. More than 40% of the female 
astronomers in the sample state that they want to continue 
research in astronomy on the long term. Most female as- 
tronomers state that young female students have to decide 
themselves if they want to strive for a career in astronomy; 
only 17 % would recommend it. 

While this survey, by design, only covered 'easily mea- 
surable' issues of career development, including some prej- 
udices and conscious biases, we would like to mention, that 
the broad field of unconscious biases can be as important or 
harmful a factor for career development, as the topics dis- 

cussed here (see |Urry 2009 [ and references therein). 

We conclude that in order to make it more attractive for 
women to stay in astronomy, the promotion prospects, job 
safety and family support should be improved. A socially 
evolved working environment including appropriate men- 
toring schemes should not be underestimated as examples 
from outside Germany show. 

No comparable data exist for male counterparts in the 
German astronomy society. This makes it more difficult 
to judge whether certain results are specific to female as- 
tronomers and to assess the impact of multiple causes such 
as being female and having a family. It would also be inter- 
esting to study to which extent the career path choices and 
the private life differ between female and male astronomers. 
We recommend to collect similar data for a representative 
sample of female and male astronomers within a larger 
framework such as the Astronomische Gesellschaft. 

Acknowledgements. We would like to thank Jessica Agarwal, Eva 
Grebel, Inga Kamp, Stefanie Komossa, Sabine Reffert, and Sonja 
Schuh for valuable comments, Rebekka Weinel for technical sup- 
port and everyone who filled the questionnaire. 


Ainuddin, N., Gomes de Carvalho, M., Fan, P., Kelar, G., Munder, 
L, Taeb, M..: 2005, in: M. Taeb (ed.), UNU -IAS Report 

Auspurg, K., Hinz, Th.: 2010, DFG, 

Cesarsky, C, Walker, H.: 2010, A&G 51, 2.33 

Fohlmeister, J., Gramling, J., Christlieb, 

N., Hofmann, J., Michaels, L.: 2010, 
www . ar i . uni-heidelberg . de/g leichstellu ng/ zahlenH 

Greene, J., Lewis, P., Richmond, G., Stockard, J.: 2011, Journal of 
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17, 2 

Ivie, R., Tesfaye, C: 2012, Physics Today 65, 2 

Konekamp, B., Krais, B., Erlemann, M., Kausch, C: 2002, Physik 
Journal 2, 22 

Kriiger, M., et al.: 2010, AstroFrauenNetzwerk, 

www . astro . rug . nl/ ~kamp/AFN2010_krueger-stats .pdf[| 

Ivie, R., Tesfaye, C: 2011, AIP Statistical Research Center, 
www statistics 

Urry, M.: 2009, in: S. Roser (ed.), Reviews in Modern Astronomy 
21, p. 249 

Tsui, L.: 2010, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and 

Engineering, 16,4, p. 40 
Tyson, W., Borman, K.M.: 2010, Journal of Women and Minorities 

in Science and Engineering, 16,4, p. 10 

© 2012 WILEY- VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim